My Sticky Gadget

Bajuyuli baju muslim anak perempuan

TOEFL Speaking Practice #29

Task #1 - 1


The question:


Do you agree or disagree with the idea that social media has a negative impact on interpersonal communication?

My Answer:

In overall yes I do agree that social media has negative impact of our interpersonal communication. it because the anonymity of social media people can judge other people easily with not fully responsible of their comments. I've seen that a little kids come in really negative to public figure and it's just not good for his communication because maybe the public figure has different perspective about the bad act that the children think

ChatGPT Asessment:

Based on the TOEFL iBT Speaking rubrics, here is the assessment of your response:

General Description:
The response is generally clear and coherent, but there are some errors in grammar and vocabulary that may hinder the listener's understanding. The response adequately addresses the prompt, with a clear stance and relevant examples. However, the response lacks depth in exploring the topic and does not provide specific evidence or analysis. Score: 3

Delivery:
The delivery is generally clear and understandable, with a consistent pace and tone. However, there are some minor errors in pronunciation, intonation, and stress that may affect the listener's comprehension. The response maintains the speaker's attention, but the speaker could have used more varied and expressive language to engage the listener. Score: 3

Language Use:
The language use is adequate for the task, with a range of vocabulary and structures that convey the meaning effectively. However, there are some errors in grammar, word choice, and idiomatic expressions that may hinder the listener's comprehension. The speaker could have used more precise and sophisticated language to convey the ideas clearly and accurately. Score: 3

Topic Development:
The topic development is somewhat limited, with a lack of specific details and analysis to support the main idea. The response provides some examples, but they are not fully developed or relevant to the prompt. The speaker could have used more complex and insightful ideas to explore the topic in depth and provide a convincing argument. Score: 2

Overall, your response receives a score of 11 out of 16. Your response shows some understanding of the prompt and conveys your viewpoint on the topic. However, your response would benefit from deeper analysis and more specific examples to support your ideas. Additionally, you could have used more varied and precise language to convey your message clearly and accurately. Keep practicing and improving your language skills to achieve a higher score.

=============

Task #1 - 2


The question:


What qualities do you think are important in a good leader? Provide examples to support your answer.

My Answer:

In my perspective I will say that the most important thing for good leaders is how they responsible of their decision or act. good leader should never blaming others instead he or she should blaming himself because the leader is the full of responsibility about their peers or their inferior or their organization that they lead. I believe that is one of the most thing that make people to be a good leader. I've seen some people doing like that and I'm really grateful become his  team in particular

ChatGPT Asessment:

Assessment based on TOEFL iBT speaking rubrics:

General Description:
The response provides a clear and relevant answer to the prompt. The answer is organized, focused, and coherently developed. However, the response could benefit from more examples and details to support the main point.

Score: 3 out of 4

Delivery:
The speaker's delivery is generally clear and easy to understand. The pace is generally appropriate, but there are a few hesitations and minor grammatical errors. The intonation and stress are mostly correct, but there could be more variation in tone to emphasize key points.

Score: 3 out of 4

Language Use:
The speaker uses a range of vocabulary and sentence structures to express ideas. However, there are some grammatical errors and incorrect word choices that affect clarity and precision. The speaker also repeats some words and phrases unnecessarily.

Score: 2 out of 4

Topic Development:
The response includes a clear thesis statement and relevant supporting details. However, the response could benefit from more specific examples to illustrate the main point.

Score: 3 out of 4

Total Score: 11 out of 16.

Overall, the response provides a relevant and organized answer to the prompt, but could benefit from more examples and details to support the main point. The delivery is generally clear, but there are some minor grammatical errors and lack of variation in tone. The language use is generally good, but there are some errors and unnecessary repetitions. The topic development includes a clear thesis statement and relevant supporting details, but could benefit from more specific examples.

=============

Task #1 - 3


The question:


What is your opinion on the use of animals for scientific research? Do you think it's necessary or not?

My Answer:

For scientific reason of course it needed and no problem at all that researcher do something about animals. I believe because of those research many medicine has been invented that really good for our human being we can cure some diseases and virus maybe that's using anymore for the experiment. but for other things let's say abusing animals for just entertain I don't agree with that but once again but for scientific reason I fully encouraging

ChatGPT Asessment:

Based on the TOEFL iBT speaking rubrics, here is an assessment of your answer:

General Description: 3/4

You clearly state your opinion on the use of animals for scientific research.
You explain why you think it's necessary for scientific research and the benefits it brings.
You mention that you don't agree with abusing animals for entertainment.
Delivery: 3/4

Your pronunciation and intonation are clear and easy to understand.
You speak at a moderate pace with appropriate pauses.
You don't use a lot of filler words or repetitions, but there are some minor grammatical errors.
Language Use: 2/4

There are several grammatical errors throughout your answer, such as incorrect verb tense usage and subject-verb agreement errors.
You also use some informal language, such as "no problem at all" and "just entertain."
However, you do use some appropriate vocabulary related to the topic, such as "medicine" and "virus."
Topic Development: 3/4

You have a clear position on the use of animals for scientific research and provide reasons to support it.
You mention the benefits of scientific research on medicine.
However, you don't provide any specific examples or evidence to support your opinion.
Overall, your total score is 11 out of 16. To improve, you could work on using more formal and grammatically correct language and providing specific examples or evidence to support your opinion.

=============

Task #1 - 4


The question:


Do you believe that online shopping is a better way to shop than going to physical stores? Why or why not?

My Answer:

For me I do believe that online shopping is better for us because in my own experience I have no need to waste my time to commute or to go outside. it's really wasting my time. however because of that I have to pay more for shipping cost that maybe make the online shopping more expensive if I compared to offline store. but in general I do believe online shopping move forward for our society for our human being that now all kind of goods can be distributed equally all over the world

ChatGPT Asessment:

General Description:
Your response is relevant to the prompt, and you present a clear stance on the topic. You provide some supporting reasons for your opinion and make a conclusion. However, your answer is not very detailed, and you could have given more examples or elaborated further on your points.

Score: 3/4

Delivery:
Your speech is clear and easy to understand. You speak at a moderate pace and use appropriate stress and intonation to emphasize important words. You do not hesitate or stumble over your words, and you maintain a natural tone of voice throughout your response.

Score: 4/4

Language Use:
Your language use is generally good, and you use a variety of sentence structures and vocabulary. However, there are some minor errors in grammar and word choice, such as "for us" instead of "for me" and "move forward for our society" instead of "benefit our society." You could also use more academic language and avoid informal expressions like "wasting my time."

Score: 3/4

Topic Development:
Your response has some development, but it lacks details and elaboration. You present one reason why you believe online shopping is better, but you could have given more examples or explained further why you think it is more convenient. You also mention that online shopping can distribute goods equally all over the world, but you do not provide any evidence or explanation to support this claim.

Score: 2/4

Overall Score: 12/16
Your response has some strengths, such as clear delivery and a relevant stance on the topic, but it also has some weaknesses, such as lack of details and minor errors in language use. To improve your score, you could provide more specific examples and evidence to support your points and use more formal and precise language.

=============

Task #1 - 5


The question:


Some people say that it's better to specialize in one subject while others argue that it's important to have a broad range of knowledge. What do you think?

My Answer:

For me who running a business I believe brother or knowledge is much better than deep knowledge. in my experience new things that I knew me perhaps a little is better for me because I can collaborate with other people and I can talk about that easily to a new people that make our Prospect would be good for my business absolutely. so maybe it could be different for other people but for me I do believe brother knowledge is better for business man all over the world

ChatGPT Asessment:

Assessment:

General Description: 3

You provided a clear opinion on the topic and gave a supporting explanation. However, the response is a bit short and lacks detail.
Delivery: 2

There are some noticeable errors in pronunciation and intonation that may hinder understanding. Additionally, the speech is a bit slow and lacks fluency.
Language Use: 2

There are several grammatical errors and some unclear or incomplete sentences. The vocabulary used is basic and there is not much variation in sentence structure.
Topic Development: 2

Although you provided a clear opinion, the response lacks depth and detail. There is only one supporting reason provided and there is not much elaboration on how having broad knowledge would be beneficial for a business.
Overall Score: 9 out of 16.

Comments: Your response addresses the prompt and provides a clear opinion. However, there are several areas that could be improved upon, such as fluency, grammar, and providing more detail in your supporting reasons. Work on developing more complex sentences and using more varied vocabulary to improve your language use. Additionally, try to provide more supporting reasons to develop your ideas further.
=============

Task #1 - 6


The question:


Do you think that people should always tell the truth, even if it may be hurtful? Why or why not?

My Answer:

In my own opinion not telling the truth and lie is a different kind of things. not telling the truth means you can just simply don't say anything or you just going to Simply move the topic to another topic. but a lie is a bad thing you talk about different with the real happening that's not good. so I do believe we have to avoid hurting people by just not telling the truth but don't lie if in the case you have to push you have to tell me something better you avoid  lie and maybe talking something else or just quiet

ChatGPT Asessment:

Based on the TOEFL iBT speaking rubrics, here's an assessment of your response:

General Description: 3
Your response is generally coherent and understandable. You provided a clear stance on the topic and supported it with some explanation. However, your response could have been more organized and developed.

Delivery: 3
Your delivery is generally clear and easy to understand, and you maintained a consistent pace throughout the response. However, there were some minor errors in pronunciation and intonation.

Language Use: 3
Your language use is generally adequate, with a few minor errors in grammar, vocabulary, and syntax. You used some appropriate vocabulary related to the topic, but your response could have been more varied and precise.

Topic Development: 2
Your response addressed the prompt but lacks sufficient depth and development. Your explanation could have been more thorough and supported with examples or personal experiences.

Overall, your total score based on the TOEFL iBT speaking rubrics is 11 out of 16. While your response is generally coherent and understandable, there is room for improvement in terms of organization, depth, and language use. To improve your score, try to practice developing your ideas more fully, using a wider range of vocabulary and sentence structures, and organizing your response more effectively.

=============

Task #1 - 7


The question:


In your opinion, is it better to travel alone or with a group of friends? Why?

My Answer:

I will say driving alone is better for me instead of with group of friends. actually I don't travel a lot if I had to choose I do much prefer to stay with my family instead of go vacation with my friends. however if I am in the in that condition that I have to go traveling or vacation I'll choose traveling alone because while I am alone I can read books explore satisfying for me no need to wait others. in my own experience my friends invite me to go to other places and I reject it because I don't feel Comfort to go with him even if that's my best friend

ChatGPT Asessment:

Based on the TOEFL iBT speaking rubrics, here is the breakdown of your answer:

General Description (2/4):
You provided a response to the question, but the response was not detailed enough. You talked about your preference for driving alone, but did not explain why you think it is better than traveling with friends.

Delivery (2/4):
Your delivery was somewhat choppy, with pauses and hesitations in your speech. You also used repetitive phrases such as "if I had to choose" and "in my own experience."

Language Use (2/4):
There were several grammatical errors in your answer, such as "if I am in the in that condition" and "explore satisfying for me." Your vocabulary was also limited, and you repeated the same words several times.

Topic Development (2/4):
You touched upon the topic, but did not elaborate enough. You talked about your preference for traveling alone and gave a brief explanation, but you did not provide any specific examples or reasons to support your argument.

Overall Score: 8/16
Your answer lacked specificity and coherence, and contained grammatical errors and repetitive language. In order to improve your score, try to provide more details, use a wider range of vocabulary and sentence structures, and organize your ideas more effectively.

=============

Task #1 - 8


The question:


What do you think are the advantages and disadvantages of living in a multicultural society?

My Answer:

I will say the advantages of living in Multicultural country is it can practicing empathy a lot then we if we live in  Homogeneous people. but I've seen the disadvantage of this kind of practice I've seen the Multicultural country a lot case of racism and exclusivity that not good for children I think and it's called be harmful for the future of the country. so it depends on how educate the people who live in Multicultural countries

ChatGPT Asessment:

General Description: 2/4
Your response was generally on-topic and included both advantages and disadvantages of living in a multicultural society. However, the organization of your answer could have been clearer.

Delivery: 3/4
You spoke clearly and with good pronunciation. There were a few hesitations, but overall your delivery was effective.

Language Use: 2/4
There were several errors in your use of language, including incorrect verb tenses and incomplete sentences. Your vocabulary was limited, and you repeated certain phrases.

Topic Development: 2/4
While you touched on both advantages and disadvantages of living in a multicultural society, your response lacked depth and detail. You could have provided more examples or explanations to support your points.

Overall Score: 9/16
Your response showed some understanding of the topic, but it could have been more fully developed and better organized. Additionally, there were some language errors that detracted from the clarity of your response.

=============

Task #1 - 9


The question:


Do you agree or disagree with the idea that everyone should learn a second language? Why?

My Answer:

Actually it depends who you are, I do believe an hour there is technology will provide language really easy if you are just casual travel or just visiting country for short time of period learning those language is not really important because technology can provide and translating it for you. however if you are doing for academic reason or government or bilateral connection you have to learn second language is mandatory it is important for you to learn the language not only the language but also the culture of other country.

ChatGPT Asessment:

General Description (3/4):
The response provides a clear answer to the question and includes relevant points. The speaker starts by stating that it depends on who you are and provides reasons why learning a second language may or may not be necessary. However, the response is not fully developed as it lacks specific examples to support the arguments.

Delivery (3/4):
The speaker's tone is clear and easy to understand. The pace is good, with appropriate pauses, and there are no major pronunciation issues. However, there are a few instances of hesitations and repetition, which could be improved.

Language Use (3/4):
The speaker demonstrates a good command of the language and uses a range of vocabulary to express ideas. However, there are some grammatical errors and awkward phrasing, such as "an hour there is technology" instead of "in today's technology-driven world" and "learn second language" instead of "learn a second language".

Topic Development (2/4):
The speaker provides some reasoning for their argument, but the points are not fully developed. The response lacks specific examples to support the ideas and could benefit from more elaboration and details.

Total score: 11/16
Overall, the response is good, but there is room for improvement in language use and topic development. The speaker could benefit from providing more specific examples and avoiding grammatical errors and awkward phrasing.

=============

Task #1 - 10


The question:


What are your thoughts on the impact of technology on education? Do you think it's more helpful or harmful?

My Answer:

Of course I would say technology it's really helpful for our education in overall. nowadays human being never be so educated then ever because of the technology. now people can learn from all over the world communicating each other discussing anything despite the geography and time. it never be done before since the technology such as online meeting online video occur in our human being. so I suggest that technology must be keep growing to push our education better

ChatGPT Asessment:

General Description: 3
The response is well-organized and coherent, but the introduction could be more compelling. The response directly addresses the prompt and remains focused on the topic throughout.

Delivery: 3
The delivery is generally clear, with good pacing and intonation. However, there are some minor hesitations and fillers that could be improved upon.

Language Use: 3
The speaker demonstrates a good command of the English language, but there are some minor grammatical errors and a few words are used imprecisely.

Topic Development: 3
The response provides some supporting details and examples, but could benefit from more development and specificity. The response could be strengthened by providing more concrete examples of how technology has impacted education.

Total score: 12 out of 16. The response provides a solid and well-organized argument with some supporting evidence, but could be improved with more specific and concrete examples, and by refining the language use.

=============

0 Response to "TOEFL Speaking Practice #29"

Posting Komentar