My Sticky Gadget

Bajuyuli baju muslim anak perempuan

TOEFL IBT Speaking Practice #47

Task #1 - 1


The question:


Should students be allowed to use electronic devices in the classroom?

My Answer:

In my own perspective I don't agree that students allowed to use electronic devices on the classroom, just because electric devices such as phone or any other small computer it's really make distraction for students. it could be reduce the process of learning of them.  for example if a teacher teaching something of materials that needs full attention for students and some notification can come from social media that's really distractful for students, so for me I don't agree that students must bring electronic differences in the classroom

ChatGPT Assessment, based on TOEFL iBT rubrics in scale out of 4 for each rubric (General Description, Delivery, Language Use, Topic Development):

General Description: 3 - The response provides a clear stance on the topic and supports it with reasoning.


Delivery: 3 - The response effectively communicates the main points and ideas.


Language Use: 3 - The response demonstrates effective use of language, with only minor errors or awkward phrasing.


Topic Development: 3 - The response provides relevant reasons and examples to support the stated perspective.


Overall, the response presents a well-organized argument against allowing students to use electronic devices in the classroom. It expresses a clear viewpoint and provides reasoning to support it. The delivery and language use are effective, although there are minor errors or awkward phrasing. The topic development is strong, with relevant examples and reasons provided.



=============

Task #1 - 2


The question:


Do you agree or disagree with the statement: "It's better to study alone than in a group"?

My Answer:

In my own opinion I do believe study alone is better than in a group.  because if I study alone I can fulfill all my curiosity. If I can take my time to read along materials or passage and do research on it, finding on YouTube and many websites.  for example I had trouble with understanding of financial reporting and maybe for someone else or other students it's easy but for me is not, so I took all night long to study it. I don't want to be a burden for group.  that's why I do prefer study London in a group 

ChatGPT Assessment, based on TOEFL iBT rubrics in scale out of 4 for each rubric (General Description, Delivery, Language Use, Topic Development):

General Description: 3

The response provides a clear opinion on the topic and supports it with a personal example. The reasons given for preferring to study alone are explained adequately. However, there is a contradiction in the response where it states both that studying alone is better and that studying in a group is preferred. This inconsistency affects the overall coherence of the argument.


Delivery: 3

The response effectively communicates the opinion and provides a relevant example. The ideas are presented in a logical order, and the response is generally coherent. However, there is some confusion caused by the contradictory statement mentioned earlier.


Language Use: 3

The language used is generally appropriate and understandable. There are some minor errors in grammar and sentence structure, but they do not significantly impede comprehension. Vocabulary choice is adequate, although there is room for improvement in terms of variety and precision.


Topic Development: 2

While the response does present an opinion and supports it with an example, the argument lacks depth and development. The response could benefit from providing more specific details and expanding on the reasons for preferring to study alone.


Overall, the response demonstrates an understanding of the topic and presents a coherent argument, but it could be improved with clearer reasoning and better organization. The response receives an average score of 2.75 out of 4.



=============

Task #1 - 3


The question:


Should high school students be required to take physical education classes?

My Answer:

I believe students should take and require  by school to take physical education classes.  because in the future they certainly need some kind of knowledge to do exercising to make their body in health shape.  For example I have a friend that not really understand how to do exercises and maybe he doesn't like at all because he never thought to be doing exercise make it you happy or make him happy that's not good for his  health.  that's why I suggest that students learn physical education in classes


ChatGPT Assessment, based on TOEFL iBT rubrics in scale out of 4 for each rubric (General Description, Delivery, Language Use, Topic Development):

General Description: 3

The response adequately addresses the topic and provides a clear opinion on whether high school students should be required to take physical education classes.


Delivery: 2.5

The response is coherent and generally organized, but there are a few instances of unclear or awkward phrasing that impact the overall clarity.


Language Use: 2.5

The language use is generally effective, but there are some errors in grammar, sentence structure, and word choice that occasionally hinder comprehension.


Topic Development: 3

The response provides a clear argument in support of requiring physical education classes for high school students. The example provided helps illustrate the importance of exercise and its impact on overall health.


Overall, the response demonstrates a good understanding of the topic and effectively communicates the author's viewpoint, but there are areas where the language use could be improved for greater clarity and coherence. The score is 2.75 out of 4.




=============

Task #1 - 4


The question:


Do you agree or disagree with the statement: "It's important for children to learn a second language"?

My Answer:

I believe for children they no need to learn a second language.  just because language is a hard skill, what the most essential for children is hard  skills such as  creativity, how to make it something in there  mind, and empathy and so on.  for example I've seen people that learning English on age 30 something and it just took one year not fully one year maybe  to fully understand and speak like natives..  that's why I think children not really need to learn a second language on their kid as a kid 


ChatGPT Assessment, based on TOEFL iBT rubrics in scale out of 4 for each rubric (General Description, Delivery, Language Use, Topic Development):

General Description: 1.5

The response provides a brief answer to the question but lacks in-depth analysis or supporting details.


Delivery: 2

The response is clear and coherent, with ideas presented in a logical order. However, it could benefit from more specific examples or evidence to support the claims.


Language Use: 2

The language use is generally appropriate and understandable. There are some minor errors in grammar and word choice, but they do not hinder comprehension.


Topic Development: 1

The response does not provide sufficient development of the topic. The arguments lack depth, reasoning, and supporting evidence. The response would benefit from expanding on the benefits or drawbacks of children learning a second language.


Overall, the response lacks thorough analysis and supporting evidence, resulting in a weak argument. It would benefit from providing more specific examples or evidence to support the points made.



=============

Task #1 - 5


The question:


Should governments invest more in renewable energy sources?

My Answer:

I believe my government  no need to invest more in renewable energy sources.  because I'm living in Indonesia that the economy really depends on conventional energy sources such as fuel and a  coal.  if they concern more about renewable energy sources it could be happen displacement about jobs and of course the decline of our economy, not to mention that renewable energy is really expensive.  that's why I think my government should not invest more in renewable energy sources by now


ChatGPT Assessment, based on TOEFL iBT rubrics in scale out of 4 for each rubric (General Description, Delivery, Language Use, Topic Development):

General Description: 2

The response provides a clear stance on the issue, stating that the government should not invest more in renewable energy sources. However, the explanation lacks depth and supporting details.


Delivery: 2

The response is coherent and understandable, but it lacks specific examples or evidence to support the argument. The response could benefit from a more organized structure and smoother transitions between ideas.


Language Use: 2

The response demonstrates basic language proficiency with understandable sentences and vocabulary. However, there are some grammatical errors and awkward phrasing that could be improved for clarity and fluency.


Topic Development: 1

The response lacks sufficient development and supporting evidence. The argument is presented briefly without elaboration, and there is no exploration of counterarguments or alternative perspectives. The response could benefit from providing specific examples or data to support the claims made.


Overall, the response provides a basic stance on the issue but lacks sufficient development and supporting evidence. It could be improved by providing more detailed explanations, examples, and evidence to support the argument.



0 Response to "TOEFL IBT Speaking Practice #47"

Posting Komentar