My Sticky Gadget

Bajuyuli baju muslim anak perempuan

TOEFL IBT Speaking Practice #61

Speaking Task 1

Directions​: You will now be asked a question about a familiar topic. After you hear the question, you

will have 15 seconds to plan your response and 45 seconds to speak.


Do you agree or disagree with the following statement:

"Teenagers should work while they go to school, so they can learn how to be more responsible."

Provide details and examples to explain your opinion.


My answer transcript:

I agree with the statement that teenagers should go to work while they go to school.  it's because it can train and build their professionalism that's good for them in the future on the real world.  for example I have friend that not really good in work they or she always being late and after we trackback what her experience in the past that she never worked before and that's not good for her and make her not perform well


ChatGPT Assessment, based on TOEFL iBT rubrics in scale out of 4 for each rubric (Delivery, Language Use, Topic Development)?

Based on the TOEFL iBT rubrics, here's an assessment of your response for each rubric:


Delivery: 3 - The delivery of your response is generally effective. You speak clearly and express your ideas with coherence. However, there are a few instances where you stumble or pause briefly, affecting the flow of your speech.


Language Use: 2.5 - Your use of language is generally appropriate, with a few minor errors and some awkward phrasing. You demonstrate a decent range of vocabulary, but there are moments where your sentences could be more precise or natural.


Topic Development: 2.5 - You present your opinion clearly and provide one example to support your stance. However, the development of your response could be stronger. You could have expanded on your explanation by discussing other potential benefits of teenagers working while going to school or addressing potential counterarguments.


Overall, your response shows a good understanding of the prompt and provides some relevant details and examples. With some improvements in language use and topic development, your response could be even stronger.



-------



Speaking Task 2

Directions​: You will now read a short passage and then listen to a conversation on the same topic.

You will then be asked a question about the passages. After you hear the question, you will have 30

seconds to prepare your response and 60 seconds to speak.

You have 45 seconds to read the passage below. You may begin reading now.


More Flexible Meal Plans


As of right now, the school offers only one meal plan to students, which permits them to

eat at the cafeteria once per day for the entire school year. The problem with this is that

there are students who are busy with part-time jobs away from campus and don’t have

time to eat at the cafeteria on a daily basis. Since these students still want to eat at the

cafeteria occasionally I believe it would be best if the school started to sell meal plans that

provide a specific number of meals which students can eat whenever they want. Not only

will this be more convenient, but it will also increase the cafeteria’s income as a greater

number of students will consider taking advantage of its services.

Sincerely,

Johnny B. Goode


Now, listen to a conversation about the same topic


Now answer the question.

The man expresses his opinion on cafeteria meal plans. State his opinion and explain the reasons he gives for

holding that opinion.


Speaking Task 2: Transcript

Man​:​ Hey Lisa, did you read Johnny's letter in the school paper?

Woman​:​ Yeah, I'm just finishing it now, actually. I can't believe he finally complained about it.

Man​:​ Yeah, and I think it's great. Almost everyone I talk to agrees that the cafeteria should be more flexible when

it comes to meal plans. I mean, I'm not crazy about the cafeteria food, but I like to go there to meet up

with friends and hang out. I'd buy a 50-meal plan, for example, but I would never get the yearly meal plan.

Woman​:​ Yes, I guess you have a point, but, won't this make the meals more expensive? I am on the school's

meal plan right now and the one thing I love about it is the price. It's so cheap.

Man​:​ I don't see why a new meal plan structure would affect the price of the current system. It's basically just

adding more options. Even though I might have to pay more per meal for my plan, it fits my schedule

better. This type of structure is going to make everyone happy, both the students who don't plan on eating

at the cafeteria every day, and the school, which can make a bit more money from the variety of options.

And even students like you who are already on the meal plan won't be affected by this change

Woman​:​ I guess you're right. Maybe Johnny will get what he wants after all.



My answer transcript:

According to the conversation demand totally agree with Johnny later he feels that Johnny letter was great and he can't believe that Johnny finally complained about it.  then she talked to Lisa about this letter and he feels like to hang out on the cafeteria even if it only small what amount of meal and he think that the flexibility would not affect people that only subscribe into one meal like Lisa 


ChatGPT Assessment, based on TOEFL iBT rubrics in scale out of 4 for each rubric (Delivery, Language Use, Topic Development)?

Based on the TOEFL iBT rubrics, here's an assessment of your response:


Delivery: 3 - Your response is generally clear and easy to understand. You maintain a steady pace and fluency throughout, with only a few minor hesitations.


Language Use: 3 - Your language use is effective overall. You use a range of vocabulary and sentence structures to convey your ideas. There are some minor errors in grammar and word choice, but they do not significantly hinder understanding.


Topic Development: 3 - You address the main points of the conversation and accurately state the man's opinion. You explain the reasons he gives for holding that opinion, mentioning the desire for more flexibility in meal plans and the potential benefits for both students and the school. However, your explanation could have been more detailed and specific.


Overall, your response demonstrates a good understanding of the passage and conversation, and you effectively communicate your ideas. Keep practicing to further improve your language use and topic development skills.



--------------------------------




Speaking Task 3

Directions​: You will now read a short passage and then listen to a lecture on the same topic. You will

then be asked a question about the passages. After you hear the question, you will have 30 seconds to

prepare your response and 60 seconds to speak.

You have 45 seconds to read the passage below. You may begin reading now.


Types of Leadership


Every day we come across leaders in school, business, and life, and each has their own

unique approach to managing others. The way people use their power and authority

differs from person to person, but there are some recurring patterns. In business theory,

there are two main types of leaders: instrumental and expressive. Instrumental leaders are

very demanding individuals. Leaders of this type expect their employees to be professional

and focused on work rather than on relationships with their colleagues. In contrast,

expressive leaders are concerned about employee well-being. They believe strong

relationships and a positive work environment improve a group’s overall productivity.


Now listen to a lecture about this topic in a behavioral psychology class


Now answer the question.

Using the examples from the lecture, describe two types of leadership.


Speaking Task 3: Transcript

“​Okay, so, you may have never heard of the terms instrumental and expressive before when it comes to

leadership, but I bet you could think of a couple of people who fit these descriptions.

Now, I used to have a part-time job working as a waiter at a restaurant. I had a boss named Bill who was a

typical instrumental leader. Not only was he good at managing his business, but he also had extensive

experience as a waiter. He had high standards in the way we treated customers and he expected all of us to do

the same. The waiters were almost completely forbidden to speak with one another while at work, even when we

didn't have any customers. He felt that if we focused on our tasks and the customers, not on each other, we

wouldn't get distracted or become lazy. He did have a successful restaurant, but there were certainly other

approaches he could have taken that weren't so strict.

You know, my boss right now is Professor Green, the head of my department. She really knows how to treat the

university staff with respect. While there are rules we have to follow and deadlines we must meet, she hardly ever

pressures us. She treats us like adults and we, the teaching staff, all do our jobs to the best of our abilities

because we don't want to disappoint or upset her. She holds weekly staff meetings, so we can communicate

about problems in class and even holds parties at her home once a month. We all feel like part of an open and

honest team, and that would not be possible without her expressive type of leadership.​”



My answer transcript:

There are two kind of leadership according to the material those two are instrumental leadership and expressive leadership.  the instrumental leadership is kind of leader that really demanding and the other one expressive one is concerned about well-being of their the inferior. The woman  in the conversation talk about Bill her boss and the restaurant he has high standard and really supervising  his stuff and must following the rules this kind of leader gives pressure to the employee even if the business is going well.  and secondly the woman talk about Professor Green her boss right now at the University, Professor Green leadership with respect and give no pressure to his staff and make us or make her and her friend do the best.  to sum up the woman seems like more comfortable with expressive leadership that can found in  Professor Green


ChatGPT Assessment, based on TOEFL iBT rubrics in scale out of 4 for each rubric (Delivery, Language Use, Topic Development)?

Delivery: 3 - Your delivery is generally clear and understandable. Your pacing is appropriate, and you maintain a consistent speaking flow. However, there are a few instances of hesitations and repetition, which slightly affect the overall smoothness of your response.


Language Use: 3 - Your language use is generally effective and appropriate for the task. You demonstrate a good understanding of vocabulary related to leadership and effectively convey your ideas. There are a few minor errors in grammar and word choice, but they do not hinder comprehension.


Topic Development: 3 - You address the question and provide a coherent response. You accurately describe the two types of leadership mentioned in the lecture and provide specific examples from the passage to support your points. However, your response could benefit from further elaboration and development of ideas to provide a more comprehensive analysis.


Overall, your response demonstrates a good understanding of the lecture and passage, and you effectively convey your ideas within the time limit.









----------------------



Speaking Task 4

Directions​: You will now listen to part of a lecture. You will then be asked a question about it. After

you hear the question, you will have 20 seconds to prepare your response and 60 seconds to speak.


Now listen to part of a lecture in a psychology class


Now answer the question.

Using points and examples from the talk, describe the two theories that explain why humans sleep.




Speaking Task 4: Transcript


“​We spend approximately one-third of our lives sleeping. Given that the average life expectancy for most of us

falls between 73 and 79 years old, we can expect to spend approximately 25 years of our lives sleeping.

Surprisingly, the reason why we humans sleep is still mostly a mystery, but there are a few theories that attempt

to explain the function of sleep.

One popular hypothesis argues that sleep is essential in order for us humans to restore the resources we use

throughout the day. The same way that bears hibernate in the winter when resources are scarce, perhaps people

sleep at night to reduce the amount of energy they use. It has recently become fashionable to argue that people

need to sleep at least eight hours a night in order to function at their optimal physical and mental capacity. I'm

sure all of you have felt pretty sluggish after a late night with just a few hours of sleep, so this theory makes

sense, intuitively.

However, there are others who are not convinced by this simplistic explanation of why we sleep and have

proposed other explanations.

Another popular theory proposes that sleep is an adaptive response to predatory risk. In other words, our great

ancestors were more likely to be hunted and killed at night by other animals, so a desire to sleep in a safe,

comfortable area was an evolutionary mechanism that helped shield us from harm. As I'm sure you are all

aware, there are more risks at night time since visibility is so low. We haven't adapted our senses in the same

way other creatures have to survive throughout the night. Accordingly, it makes sense to believe that sleep is a

biological response to our environmental conditions, but, just like the theory involving energy conservation, there

are some who disagree.​”



My answer transcript:

According to the lecture that 1/3 of Our Lives is sleep if we count that our lives in 73 to 79 years old it must be 25 years we are sleeping.  to theory of regarding this sleeping he explained to function of sleep for us.  for first one first one human their Physical and mental resources, like other animal doing hibernate that's good to recover.  and the second theory is about adaptive risk in the past maybe human couldn't see in the dark so sleeping can chill them from harm


ChatGPT Assessment, based on TOEFL iBT rubrics in scale out of 4 for each rubric (Delivery, Language Use, Topic Development)?

Delivery: 3

The delivery of the response is generally clear and coherent. The speaker effectively conveys the main points from the lecture and provides a brief explanation of the two theories. However, there are some minor issues with fluency and coherence in a few sentences.


Language Use: 2.5

The language use is generally appropriate, but there are some grammatical errors and instances of awkward phrasing that affect the clarity of the response. Some sentences could be rephrased or revised for smoother delivery.


Topic Development: 3

The speaker addresses the question by summarizing the two theories explained in the lecture: resource restoration and adaptive response to predatory risk. They provide examples and explanations for each theory. However, the response could have been more comprehensive by elaborating on each theory with more supporting details or examples.


Overall, the response demonstrates a good understanding of the lecture, but there is room for improvement in language use and providing more detailed explanations.


0 Response to "TOEFL IBT Speaking Practice #61"

Posting Komentar