Task 1
The question:
Agree/Disagree: Many schools are adopting a "No Homework" policy to reduce stress among students. Do you agree or disagree with this approach?
My Answer:
I would say I totally agree with the statement that school should be Implement no homework policy for their students. it's not only because it will not giving stress among the students if the school doesn't give homework but also the students could spend their time at house or home with their family and parents. I've seen my nephew that I got really many homeworks when she go to the home and at the other day she felt she doesn't want to go to school because she's carry about she done wrong with the homework
Please do Assessment to my Speaking TOEFL IBT Practice, based on TOEFL iBT rubrics in scale out of 10 for each rubric (Delivery, Language Use, Topic Development):
Sure, I can assess your response to the given question based on the TOEFL iBT rubrics. Please note that I will evaluate your response objectively, considering the criteria of Delivery, Language Use, and Topic Development, each on a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 being the highest score.
Delivery (7/10):
Your response is clear and well-structured.
However, there are some language fluency issues that affect the flow of your speech, such as grammar mistakes and awkward phrasing.
Your speech could benefit from a smoother delivery to enhance overall comprehension.
Language Use (6/10):
While you use English to express your ideas, there are several grammar and vocabulary issues in your response that affect clarity and precision.
For example, you say, "I totally agree with the statement that school should be Implement no homework policy for their students," which could be more clearly expressed as, "I strongly agree with the idea of schools implementing a 'No Homework' policy for their students."
Additionally, you use phrases like "she's carry about she done wrong with the homework," which could be improved to "she's worried that she did her homework wrong."
Topic Development (7/10):
You provide a clear opinion in favor of the "No Homework" policy and support it with an anecdote about your nephew.
However, you could expand your argument by providing more reasons and evidence to support your position.
Developing your points further and providing more specific examples would strengthen your response.
Overall, your response is coherent and presents a clear viewpoint. However, there is room for improvement in terms of language use and providing more detailed support for your argument. The total score would be 20 out of 30.
=============
Task 2
Reading Passage:
The university administration has decided to introduce mandatory physical fitness classes for all enrolled students starting from the next academic year. The initiative aims to promote a holistic approach to education by emphasizing not only intellectual growth but also physical well-being. Classes will be conducted twice a week and will include activities ranging from aerobics to yoga. While this is a required course, accommodations will be made for students with medical conditions. The administration believes that integrating physical education into the curriculum will enhance academic performance, reduce stress, and contribute to a more balanced lifestyle for students.
Listening Passage:
Student A: Have you heard about the new mandatory fitness classes? What do you think about it?
Student B: Yeah, I saw the announcement. I have mixed feelings, to be honest. On one hand, physical fitness is important, and it can help us deal with stress.
Student A: I agree, exercise can improve our overall well-being. But don't you think making it mandatory is a bit much?
Student B: That's what I'm concerned about. Some people have other commitments like part-time jobs or academic responsibilities. They might find it difficult to fit these classes into their schedules.
Student A: Plus, there's the issue of personal choice. I mean, shouldn't students have the freedom to decide whether they want to attend such classes?
Student B: Exactly. Physical fitness is important, but making it a requirement might not be the best approach for everyone involved.
The question:
Summarize the students' viewpoints on the new mandatory physical fitness classes. What reasons do they provide for their opinions?
My Answer:
The campus has a plan for implementing the physical fitness classes mandatory for every students on the next academic year in order not only to improve the intellectual of students but also the physical quality of students this plan will be twice a week for every student with mandatory count as curriculum. on the other hand the from the conversation between two students these two students seems agree that physical activity will reduce our stress and good for our well-being especially for students. but these two student has two concerns about it the first one is because it is will be mandatory it should be burden for students who has part-time jobs and the other one they are concern is about the personal choice of sports
Please do Assessment to my Speaking TOEFL IBT Practice, based on TOEFL iBT rubrics in scale out of 10 for each rubric (Delivery, Language Use, Topic Development):
Certainly, I can assess your response to summarizing the students' viewpoints on the new mandatory physical fitness classes based on the TOEFL iBT rubrics. I will evaluate your response objectively, considering the criteria of Delivery, Language Use, and Topic Development, each on a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 being the highest score.
Delivery (6/10):
Your response is clear and organized, but it lacks a natural flow.
You use somewhat awkward phrasing and grammatical errors, which can make the response a bit challenging to follow.
While your pronunciation and enunciation are generally understandable, there is room for improvement in fluency.
Language Use (5/10):
Your response contains several language issues, including sentence structure and vocabulary choice.
For instance, you mentioned, "in order not only to improve the intellectual of students but also the physical quality of students," which could be more clearly expressed as, "to enhance not only students' intellectual abilities but also their physical well-being."
You also said, "this plan will be twice a week for every student with mandatory count as curriculum," which could be improved to, "These classes will be held twice a week and will be counted as part of the curriculum."
There are multiple instances where sentences lack clarity and conciseness.
Topic Development (6/10):
You provide a summary of the main points discussed by the students in the listening passage.
However, your response could benefit from more specific details and direct quotations from the conversation to support the students' viewpoints.
Additionally, you could have highlighted the reasons provided by the students more explicitly.
Overall, your response conveys the basic ideas discussed by the students, but it contains several language issues that affect clarity and precision. Providing more specific details and addressing language issues would improve the response. The total score would be 17 out of 30.
=============
Task 3
Reading Passage:
Cultural assimilation is the process by which individuals or groups from one culture come to adopt the practices, norms, and values of another culture. This process can be both voluntary and involuntary and is often a complex blend of both. While assimilation may lead to the loss of cultural identity, it can also foster a sense of belonging and unity within the host culture. Critics argue that cultural assimilation can be a form of cultural erasure, stripping individuals of their unique cultural attributes. On the other hand, proponents claim that assimilation can create a harmonious, unified society.
Listening Passage:
Today, we are going to delve deeper into the topic of cultural assimilation, a process that has both advocates and critics. Proponents of cultural assimilation often point out that it eases the integration of minority groups into the majority culture. For instance, when immigrants learn the language and customs of their host country, they usually find it easier to get jobs and access services.
However, critics contend that this can result in the loss of rich cultural traditions. Take Native American communities, for example; forced assimilation through boarding schools led to generations losing touch with their native languages and traditions. This has long-term psychological and social consequences.
Additionally, there's an ethical dimension. Should majority cultures force minority cultures to assimilate? Or should society encourage multiculturalism, where multiple cultures coexist without one overshadowing the others? The reality is often somewhere in between, with individuals adopting some aspects of the host culture while maintaining elements of their own.
The question:
Explain the pros and cons of cultural assimilation as discussed in the lecture. How does the lecture build upon the ideas presented in the reading passage?
My Answer:
Cultural assimilation is processed the blending between one or two culture and individuals or groups that transferring norms and culture and Etc. according to the professor and the reading passage there are critics and Advocate about this cultural civilization. the professor mentioned about the advantage of this assimilation for example people from the minor society that came to measure that a house then learning a new language on that major culture at it's what it will be give him better chance to get a job. and the critics came to for instance the American boarding school because it is boarding school language and culture of local could be gone so the uniqueness of one culture could get erasive
Please do Assessment to my Speaking TOEFL IBT Practice, based on TOEFL iBT rubrics in scale out of 10 for each rubric (Delivery, Language Use, Topic Development):
Certainly, I can assess your response to explaining the pros and cons of cultural assimilation as discussed in the lecture and how it builds upon the ideas presented in the reading passage based on the TOEFL iBT rubrics. I will evaluate your response objectively, considering the criteria of Delivery, Language Use, and Topic Development, each on a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 being the highest score.
Delivery (6/10):
Your response is somewhat clear and organized, but it lacks a natural flow.
There are some grammar and vocabulary issues, which affect the overall coherence of your response.
While your pronunciation and enunciation are generally understandable, there is room for improvement in fluency and intonation.
Language Use (5/10):
Your response contains several language issues, including sentence structure and vocabulary choice.
For example, you said, "Cultural assimilation is processed the blending between one or two culture," which could be improved to, "Cultural assimilation is the process of blending two or more cultures."
There are also issues with word choice and phrasing, making some parts of your response unclear.
Topic Development (5/10):
Your response provides a basic explanation of cultural assimilation and mentions both the pros and cons.
However, it lacks specific examples and details from the lecture to support these points.
You mention the example of immigrants learning a new language, but you could have elaborated on this with more information from the lecture.
The connection between the lecture and the reading passage is somewhat weak, and you could have discussed how the lecture builds upon the ideas presented in the reading passage in more detail.
Overall, your response addresses the topic but contains language issues that affect clarity and precision. Providing more specific examples and elaborating on the lecture's content would strengthen your response. The total score would be 16 out of 30.
=============
Task 4
Listening Passage:
Professor: "Good afternoon, class. Today we're going to discuss two prominent theories of language acquisition in children. The first is B.F. Skinner's Behaviorist Theory, and the second is Noam Chomsky's Innatist Theory. Both theories attempt to explain how children acquire language, but they approach the topic quite differently.
B.F. Skinner's Behaviorist Theory posits that language is a learned behavior. According to this theory, children acquire language through a process of conditioning. For example, when a child says 'milk,' and then receives milk, that action is reinforced. Over time, the child associates the word 'milk' with the liquid and the act of receiving it. Skinner argues that the environment and interaction with caregivers play a critical role in language development.
Noam Chomsky's Innatist Theory, on the other hand, suggests that the ability to acquire language is innate, or built-in. Chomsky proposes the concept of a 'Language Acquisition Device,' or LAD, a hypothetical organ in the brain specifically designed for language acquisition. According to Chomsky, children don't need extensive environmental stimuli to learn a language; instead, they possess a natural ability to understand the grammatical rules of any language.
So, to sum up, Skinner's Behaviorist Theory focuses on environmental factors and conditioning as the primary methods of language acquisition. Chomsky's Innatist Theory, however, contends that children are born with an innate capacity for language acquisition, irrespective of external influences.
While both theories have their merits and limitations, they serve as foundational models for understanding how children acquire language. Studies in linguistics and psychology often draw upon these theories, and ongoing research attempts to synthesize or challenge them. Thank you."
The question:
Summarize the two theories of language acquisition discussed in the lecture. How do they differ in their approach to explaining how children acquire language?
My Answer:
Letter is talking about language acquisition for children how they acquire the language skill for them. according to the lecture there are two theory about language acquisition for children diversity already that more on depends on environment and conditioning for example A kid will learn about milk if the kid heard about me and receive milk this conditioning and behavior will construct the language skill for student. the second theory it's talk about the kids already born with the language skills on their brain it is the favorite thing theory that language already on their kid brain brain and no need extensive conditioning for kids to learn. both of the theory has advantage and disadvantages but actually one of them are used and complete each others
Please do Assessment to my Speaking TOEFL IBT Practice, based on TOEFL iBT rubrics in scale out of 10 for each rubric (Delivery, Language Use, Topic Development):
Certainly, I can assess your response summarizing the two theories of language acquisition discussed in the lecture and how they differ in their approach to explaining how children acquire language based on the TOEFL iBT rubrics. I will evaluate your response objectively, considering the criteria of Delivery, Language Use, and Topic Development, each on a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 being the highest score.
Delivery (6/10):
Your response is clear and organized, but it lacks a natural flow and is somewhat disjointed.
You pause at times during your explanation, which affects the overall fluency of your speech.
While your pronunciation and enunciation are generally understandable, there is room for improvement in fluency and intonation.
Language Use (5/10):
Your response contains several language issues, including sentence structure and vocabulary choice.
For example, you said, "Letter is talking about language acquisition for children," which should be, "The lecture is discussing language acquisition in children."
There are also issues with word choice and phrasing that make some parts of your response unclear.
Topic Development (5/10):
Your response provides a basic summary of the two theories of language acquisition discussed in the lecture.
However, you could have elaborated more on the differences between the two theories and provided specific examples from the lecture to support your points.
The connection between the lecture content and the theories could have been made clearer.
Overall, your response addresses the topic but contains language issues that affect clarity and precision. Providing more specific examples and elaborating on the lecture's content would strengthen your response. The total score would be 16 out of 30.
=============
0 Response to "TOEFL IBT Speaking Practice #97"
Posting Komentar